Park.klub

For the token, what we'd like to do is have neither too large nor too small a supply.

The main idea is that the tokenomics should be understood by everyone. It's essential to have non-complex tokenomics so that all users know what they're buying. Don't include unnecessary actors and align all stakeholders equally.

Not all tokens have the same appreciation, listings, or timing. There are many factors we don't control, so the goal is to create good tokenomics.

Because price is psychological - having a token that appreciates... altcoins are the last thing people buy and the first line to disappear, justifiably so, so we'll see.

Psychologically, price is everything. We see this in traditional finance where stocks split when they rise too high, as we've seen with Apple, Nvidia, and many others. After that, it depends on which direction we want the token to go.

To make the proposition viable, we need the means in terms of revenue, maturity, market share, etc., to enable the proposition to be considered. There's no point in asking people to buy PRK if the protocol doesn't make money. We shouldn't be in a situation where we're declaring economic activity that isn't real, living on subsidies, etc. We need to be in a real economic activity where the protocol's net profits are used to buy PRK on secondary markets and also distribute protocol revenue to PRK stakers. We should add other utilities like fee reduction with payment of swaps, bridges, P2P in PRK - essentially, having the capabilities to make it happen.

And the token should have utility. Having a decentralized structure remains most important.

@EnzoPark

2025, PARIS